It is not rocket science, but here we are.
The Army needs a strategic recruiting plan directly linked to the 2022 National Security Strategy (NSS). In last year’s effort, we used CTLR+F for ‘recruiting’: “The success of these efforts and our foreign policy will require strengthening the national security workforce by recruiting and retaining diverse, high-caliber talent (Biden, 2022).”
That is it. Nothing concrete or specific.
Until we ignore decades of movies and books speaking to the human flaw to create a robotic entity or artificial intelligence that turns us into an extinct species (see Cyberdyne Systems) or batteries (ref. Matrix), we will need people to program, fuel, fix, and operate our fleets of vehicles, ships, and jets. Very few sign their name to the rolls of service based on intrinsic value. Most need a paycheck (not a potential shutdown), solid training, good facilities, ammo, working targets to hit, and a respectable quality of life.
Soldier quality of life is critical to military readiness and troop morale. The conditions in which service members live, particularly in army barracks, play a significant role in their overall well-being and ability to perform their duties effectively. Unfortunately, poor living conditions can undermine the quality of life and readiness. Service members have reported their concerns to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), highlighting the need for the Department of Defense (DOD) to take action. However, the GAO has identified weaknesses in the DOD’s efforts to maintain and improve barracks conditions, including insufficient oversight. In this article, we will explore the impact of poor living conditions on soldier’s quality of life and readiness and the need for greater attention and improvements in this area.
- Who in the Department of Defense is Responsible for the Barracks?
- The State of Barracks: A Closer Look
- Factors Contributing to Poor Living Conditions
- The Impact of Poor Living Conditions on Soldier Quality of Life
- Readiness Compromised: How Poor Living Conditions Affect Duty Performance
- The Role of the Department of Defense: Insufficient Oversight and Funding
- Potential Solutions to Improve Soldier Living Conditions
- Advocating for Change: The Importance of Addressing Poor Living Conditions
- Conclusion: Ensuring the Well-being of Those Who Serve
Introduction: The GAO Report
Soldiers, the brave men and women who dedicate their lives to protecting our country, exemplify the highest level of commitment and sacrifice. However, behind their unwavering strength and determination lies a harsh reality threatening to undermine their quality of life: poor living conditions. According to the recent GAO report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), service members have voiced their concerns about the deplorable state of barracks, affecting their overall well-being and compromising their readiness for duty. The GAO’s findings shed light on the glaring weaknesses within the Department of Defense’s (DOD) efforts to maintain and improve the living conditions of our soldiers. Shockingly, the GAO deemed the DOD’s oversight insufficient, failing to adequately monitor and track information on the state of barracks or foster collaboration for improvement initiatives. As a result, the institution responsible for safeguarding our soldiers’ welfare lacks clarity on the funding required to address this critical issue. It is disheartening to learn that while the DOD has requested approximately $15 billion for overall facility sustainment for fiscal year 2024, the allocation towards improving barracks remains ambiguous. This substantial budget, intended to support and enhance the capabilities of our military personnel, is compromised by a lack of comprehensive funding information. Soldiers who already endure countless challenges and sacrifices are left in limbo, uncertain about the future of their living conditions and their impact on their quality of life and readiness for duty. We delve deeper into the alarming problem of poor living conditions and its detrimental effects on soldiers’ quality of life. We explore the various factors contributing to this issue, examine its consequences on our troops, and propose potential solutions to rectify these deficiencies. Join us as we strive to bring attention to this critical matter and advocate for the improved well-being of those who selflessly serve our nation.
Who in the Department of Defense is Responsible for the Barracks?
The establishment of a Chief Housing Officer was directed by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, with the clarification that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment should hold this position, as stated in the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023. The Chief Housing Officer oversees all housing, including barracks housing, and creates and standardizes housing policies and processes. Additional OSD offices also have responsibilities for managing barracks facilities, quality-of-life effects related to housing, and barracks funding (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2023).
The State of Barracks: A Closer Look
Regarding the state of barracks, the living conditions for our soldiers are far from ideal. These facilities, which serve as their homes away from home, are plagued by many issues that compromise their quality of life and overall well-being. From dilapidated infrastructure to inadequate maintenance, the state of barracks is a pressing concern that demands immediate attention. One of the primary factors contributing to poor living conditions in barracks is the lack of funding and resources allocated for their upkeep. The Department of Defense’s insufficient oversight and failure to track information on the state of barracks have resulted in a lack of clarity regarding funding requirements. As a result, the military leaves soldiers in substandard living conditions that do not meet even the most basic standards.
Furthermore, outdated infrastructure exacerbates the problem. The DOD constructed many Army barracks decades ago as part of a large-scale renovation and upgrade plan. This project led to leaky roofs, faulty plumbing systems, and inadequate heating or cooling systems. Such deficiencies not only compromise the comfort and safety of our soldiers but also pose health risks.
Factors Contributing to Poor Living Conditions
The GAO report stated, “service members reported to GAO that the conditions of barracks affect their quality of life and readiness” and “the GAO found weaknesses in the Department of Defense’s (DOD) efforts to maintain and improve their conditions (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2023).” Here are the three top takeaways:
- DOD does not reliably assess conditions, and some barracks are substandard. This lack of assessment hampers efforts to identify and address issues and leaves soldiers living in subpar conditions that do not meet basic standards of comfort and safety.
- DOD does not have complete funding information to make informed decisions, which impedes their ability to make informed decisions regarding improvements. Without a clear understanding of the financial resources required, allocating funds effectively and efficiently becomes challenging. The ambiguity surrounding funding allocation further exacerbates the problem, leaving soldiers uncertain about whether their living conditions will ever see any meaningful improvements.
- DOD conducts insufficient oversight when it comes to maintaining and improving barracks. This failure to adequately monitor and track information on the barracks’ condition hinders progress in rectifying deficiencies. Proper oversight mechanisms need to be in place to ensure accountability and foster collaboration among relevant stakeholders.
The shortcomings identified in the GAO report highlight significant weaknesses within the DOD’s efforts to address this critical issue. By failing to conduct reliable assessments, lacking comprehensive funding information, and conducting insufficient oversight, the DOD undermines its ability to improve soldiers’ living conditions. The military must bring attention to this matter to make necessary changes promptly and effectively. Our brave men and women in uniform deserve nothing less than optimal living conditions that support their well-being and enable them to fulfill their duties with utmost dedication and readiness.
Another contributing factor is a lack of proper maintenance protocols. Due to limited resources and workforce, routine maintenance tasks are often backlogged or neglected, leading to a deterioration of living conditions over time. Issues such as broken windows, malfunctioning electrical systems, and pest infestations are not promptly addressed, further exacerbating the problem. This quality of life problem turns into a performance problem as soldier no longer want to be stationed at their location and cannot wait to PCS (permanent change of station). Unfortunately, after multiple run-ins with the same issues at different locations, soldiers changed their messaging from “I cannot wait to leave this installation” to “I cannot wait to leave the Army.” That messaging, from someone currently serving and the same age and demographic as those the military needs to fill the rosters, has more power than any commercial, fancy pop-up stand, or free t-shirt.
The Impact of Poor Living Conditions on Soldier Quality of Life
Poor living conditions profoundly impact the quality of life experienced by our soldiers. Living in substandard facilities takes a toll on their mental and physical well-being, affecting their morale and overall happiness. Soldiers constantly exposed to dilapidated surroundings may experience increased stress and decreased motivation. Moreover, inadequate living conditions can also lead to health issues. For example, mold growth due to water leaks can trigger respiratory problems and allergies. Lack of proper heating or cooling systems can result in extreme temperatures that are not conducive to good health. Furthermore, a lack of privacy and personal space can harm soldiers’ mental health.
Poor living conditions in barracks harm soldiers’ quality of life and readiness for duty. Additionally, these living conditions reinforce a prospect’s decision not to enlist or commission. Recruiters are trying to sell military service as a regular 9-to-5 with additional benefits and the opportunity to travel while serving your country. Yet, current service members work and live in borderline slum-like conditions. Trainees, new to the service, go without air conditioning. When a prospect engages with the Army’s mobile fitness trailer but walks away saying, “Not for me,” it is not due to the call of a noble profession; it’s the substandard quality of life the military sneaks in the fine print. Lackluster living conditions, toxic leaders, crime, stressed units, inefficiencies, and a guaranteed paycheck, unless the decision makers decide to phone it in, are the gifts that no one wants but keeps showing up, like car warranty scam calls on your cell phone.
Not for me.
Prospects have choices that do not ask them to leave home and possibly put their life at risk, be it in a combat theatre or a garrison. The inability to retreat to a quiet, safe space or store personal belongings securely can contribute to frustration and anxiety.
Readiness Compromised: How Poor Living Conditions Affect Duty Performance
Poor living conditions impact soldier quality of life and compromise their readiness for duty. When soldiers are forced to live in substandard facilities with limited amenities, it becomes challenging to maintain the focus and concentration required for their assignments. Living in cramped quarters with inadequate storage space makes it difficult for soldiers to organize their belongings effectively. This disorganization can lead to misplaced equipment or documents, causing delays or compromising mission readiness. The lack of proper rest due to uncomfortable sleeping arrangements or excessive noise levels within barracks can also affect soldiers’ ability to perform at their best. Sleep deprivation is known to impair cognitive function and decision-making skills, which are crucial in military operations.
The Role of the Department of Defense: Insufficient Oversight and Funding
The Department of Defense plays a vital role in ensuring our soldiers’ well-being, including providing suitable living conditions. However, the current state of the barracks reflects a significant failure on their part. Insufficient oversight and a lack of comprehensive tracking systems have resulted in a lack of clarity regarding funding requirements for barracks maintenance and improvement. This ambiguity hampers the DOD’s ability to allocate resources effectively and address the pressing needs of our soldiers. Furthermore, without proper oversight, there is no accountability for the condition of the barracks. This lack of accountability allows deficiencies to persist without any meaningful action to rectify them.
Potential Solutions to Improve Soldier Living Conditions
Service members have long voiced their concerns about the impact of poor living conditions on their quality of life and troop morale. It is widely recognized that the state of army barracks plays a crucial role in determining our soldiers’ overall well-being and readiness. The Government Accountability Office made 31 recommendations, including (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2023):
- Provide guidance on barracks condition assessments
- Obtain complete funding information
- Increase oversight of barracks programs
Is this going to be more of the same? Probably. How can the DOD make progress? Here are a few ideas:
- Increase funding for barracks maintenance and repairs. Installations need a budget to cover the labor hours, materials, and other critical resources to prioritize repairs. Additionally, repairs need to step away from a completion-only metric.
- Implement regular inspections and audits to ensure barracks meet specific standards. Due to the lack of oversight and Quality Assurance/Quality Check (QAQC), many projects completed in the past decade are part of the problem.
- Improve communication channels between service members and the Department of Defense to report issues and concerns.
- Provide training and resources for barracks maintenance staff to ensure proper upkeep of facilities. Taking inspiration from the private sector, hotels, strip malls, resorts, cruise ships, and even downtown skyscrapers have an on-site maintenance and janitorial staff. The Army does not. Considering the investment, having a roving civilian maintenance team at each brigade would not be money thrown away. Last, the Army negotiates most shortcomings by adding additional duties such as barracks manager and work order tracker, but having a soldier complete a task well requires time and training. Other duties receive neither and only exacerbate issues.
- Explore public-private partnerships to bring in additional resources and expertise for barracks improvement. Hire locally or on retainer to help with surge repairs. We know this is easier said than done, as all workers must pass a background check and carry the correct certifications and training.
- Establish a feedback system for service members to provide input on their living conditions and suggest improvements. We reference the Charlotte or Atlanta airport bathrooms. Soldiers should have a way to provide immediate feedback on their Warrior Restaurants (DFACs), barracks, and workspaces. It seems better to get harsh feedback than to see it go viral on Reddit or TikTok.
- Prioritize barracks renovations and upgrades based on the needs and preferences of service members. Barracks designs are outdated, based on a small bed, wall locker, and shared kitchen. These accommodations were significant in the late 90s when there was only the Game Cube, TVs were 20″, and the most considerable item a soldier had next to their issued equipment was a CD collection. Today, a PS5 is gargantuan; soldiers can easily purchase a 40″ + television and typically have more electronics than those who designed the barracks.
- Develop a comprehensive plan for long-term barracks maintenance and improvement, including budget allocation and timeline. The Army does not simply buy a tank; they purchase the infrastructure, maintenance, and parts, a long-term purchase solution. Barracks need to have the same methodology.
- Enhance accountability and oversight within the Department of Defense to ensure proper implementation of barracks improvement initiatives. The DOD needs to create maintenance teams and then assign them to brigades. Brigade Command Teams (typically a Colonel and Command Sergeant Major) must leverage the current engineer or have a civil engineer set to manage the team. This solution helps develop officers who want to be civil engineers with real-world projects and allows the brigade to build a more robust, functional footprint for their soldiers.
- Conduct regular surveys and assessments to monitor the impact of improvements on service members’ quality of life and readiness.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted an investigation and found these concerns valid. Many service members reported that the inadequate conditions of their living quarters not only affected their physical comfort but also harmed their mental and emotional well-being. However, despite these concerns and the GAO’s findings, it is disheartening that the Department of Defense (DOD) has not proactively addressed these issues. The GAO discovered various weaknesses in the DOD’s efforts to maintain and improve the conditions of army barracks. Insufficient oversight and limited resources were significant obstacles to ensuring our soldiers’ safe and comfortable living environments. To rectify this situation and improve the quality of life for our service members, the DOD must take immediate action. Potential solutions include increasing funding for barracks maintenance, implementing stricter oversight measures, and creating a standardized system for assessing and addressing the conditions of army barracks across all military bases. By prioritizing the well-being of our soldiers and providing them with adequate living conditions, we can enhance troop morale and ultimately strengthen our military readiness.
Advocating for Change: The Importance of Addressing Poor Living Conditions
Advocating for change and raising awareness about the detrimental effects of poor living conditions on soldiers’ quality of life is crucial. Our soldiers deserve better, and our collective responsibility is to ensure that they are provided with suitable living conditions that support their well-being and readiness for duty. We can make a difference by highlighting the issue, engaging in discussions, and urging policymakers to take action. Together, we can push for increased funding, improved oversight, and effective collaboration to address the pressing issue of poor living conditions in barracks.
Conclusion: Ensuring the Well-being of Those Who Serve
Poor living conditions undermine soldier quality of life and compromise their readiness for duty. We must recognize the significance of this issue and take decisive action to rectify it. The Department of Defense must prioritize adequate funding, improve oversight mechanisms, and collaborate effectively to address infrastructure challenges. By doing so, we can ensure that our soldiers have access to safe, comfortable, and conducive living environments that support their well-being and enable them to perform at their best. Let us stand together in advocating for change and ensuring the well-being of those who selflessly serve our nation.
Sources / Credit
- Photo Credit: Government Accountability Office
- Photo Credit: Department of Defense
- Biden, J. R. (2022, October 12). National Security Strategy. Retrieved from White House: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
- U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2023, September 19). Military Barracks: Poor Living Conditions Undermine Quality of Life and Readiness. Retrieved from Government Accountability Office: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-105797.pdf